ICMCC

the international council on medical & care compunetics

science pages

26
May, 2013
Sunday

Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0″: An inter-disciplinary literature and website review

Abstract

Purpose
The purpose of this inter-disciplinary literature review was to explore renewed concerns about the reliability of online health information in light of the increasing popularity of web applications that enable more end-user-generated content (”web 2.0″).

Methods
The findings are based on a literature and web review. Literature was collected at four different points between October 2006 and October 2008 and included 56 sources from 10 academic disciplines. The web review consisted of following 6 blogs (including both new and archived posts, with comments) and one wiki for a period of 1.5 months and assessing the content for relevancy on six points, totaling 63 sources altogether.

Results
The reliability issues that are identified with respect to “web 2.0″ reiterate more general concerns expressed about the web over the last 15 years. The difference, however, lies in the scope and scale of potential problems. Social scientists have also pointed to new issues that can be especially relevant for use of web 2.0 applications in health care. Specific points of renewed concern include: disclosure of authorship and information quality, anonymity and privacy, and the ability of individuals to apply information to their personal situation. Whether or not end-users understand what social scientists call “negative network externalities” is a new concern. Finally, not all reliability issues are negative–social networking and the shift from text-based information to symbolic information, images or interactive information, are considered to enhance patient education and to provide opportunities to reach diverse groups of patients.

Conclusions
Interactive and collaborative web applications undeniably offer new opportunities for reaching patients and other health care consumers by facilitating lay information creation, sharing and retrieval. However, researchers must be careful and critical when incorporating applications or practices from other fields in health care. We must not easily dismiss concerns about reliability as outdated. Specific issues related to use of newly popular web applications for health purposes must be addressed. Nonetheless, the articles reviewed here also clearly show that potential problems can be addressed and the positive aspects of the technologies embraced.

Adams SA. Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of "web 2.0": An inter-disciplinary literature and website review. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jun;79(6):391-400.

26 February 2010

Bibliographic Data

Title:

Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0″: An inter-disciplinary literature and website review

Author(s):

Adams, Samantha A.

Journal

International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(6), pp. 391-400
(2010-02-25)

URL:

Abstract

DOI:

10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.006

PMID:

20188623

Keyword(s):

Health Information, Internet, Literature Review, Reliability, Web 2.0

Citation:
Adams SA. Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of "web 2.0": An inter-disciplinary literature and website review. Int J Med Inform. 2010 Jun;79(6):391-400.

Other Publications

In ICMCC Database

All International Journal of Medical Informatics articles (146).

Other article(s) by

Samantha A. Adams (1).

Discussion




Back to Science Pages

Back to News Page

Miscellaneous

Affiliated University Institutes

Erasmus University - Department of Healthcare Policy and Management (iBMG), Netherlands

Related science in ICMCC Database

E-health and the Web 2.0
Karkalis GI, Koutsouris DD. Proceedings of ITAB 2006, 2006

Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education
Kamel Boulos MN et al, BMC Medical Education, 6, 2006-08-15

Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another’s data
Frost JH et al, J Med Internet Res, 10(3), 2008-05-27

Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field
Hughes, Benjamin et al, J Med Internet Res, 10(3), 2008-08-06

Blog-based applications and health information: Two case studies that illustrate important questions for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) research
Adams SA. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 79(6), 2008-08-12

Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation, and openness
Eysenbach, Gunther, J Med Internet Res, 10(3), 2008-08-25

Trying to measure the quality of health information on the internet: is it time to move on?
Deshpande, Amol, and Alejandro R. Jadad, The Journal of Rheumatology, 36(1), 2009-01

Patient Empowerment: A Two Way Road
Bos L. Patient Empowerment: A Two Way Road, 2011, 2011

Promoting Participatory Medicine with Social Media: New Media Applications on Hospital Websites that Enhance Health Education and e-Patients’ Voices
Gallant LM et al, Journal of Participatory Medicine, 3, 2011-10-31

PubMed

Samantha A. Adams

Google Scholar

Samantha A. Adams

subscribe

ICMCC is member of

IFMBE

WABT

© ICMCC 2004-2011

Log in